-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Support for s390x and ppc64le #268
Comments
Hello, thank you for opening this issue! I am not against adding more architectures to the list, but I'd prefer to only add them if someone needs them. If you have a need for these architectures or know of someone else that does, then definitely lets add them. I think adding them to the I'll also request that we only build these architectures for Linux. You should be able to check which platforms are being built in the output of the |
@dnephin Thanks for the prompt reply! We, CircleCI, are doing some testing with In my initial look over, I saw #175. It looks like the CircleCI build you linked to is invalid now, or at least I can't see it. Would you mind linking to that build or a similar build where the One suggestion is for you to add a CircleCI badge to the README, so people can easily seeing the builds and status. You can find some docs on that here. Also, I have access to |
@dnephin Just tested support for
|
@dnephin Just modified the Pulling down the artifact from CircleCI on to an
I'll open up a PR soon for official support! |
@dnephin I saw a couple PRs and additions for various architectures like #181. Would you be open to adding
s390x
andppc64le
?s390x
refers to the mainframe architecture on Linux or common referred to Linux on Z. Whileppc64le
refers to the Power architecture. Both architectures are made by IBM, even though some of it is open source.From my experience both
s390x
andppc64le
both have great support in GO and usually cross compile without issue.I believe the
.goreleaser.yml
would need to be update to look something like:@dnephin If you are open to support those architecture, I can submit a PR for you if you would like!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: