-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When filtering by configuration, output does not agree with the Gradle dependencies
task
#59
Comments
Hi @DavidGregory084, I'm also playing around with Worth checking! |
@DavidGregory084 I'm going to assume that you were using the incorrect example from the docs, which specified I'll close this issue, but feel free to comment here if you believe this issue requires further investigation. |
Thanks for the link. When I forked your repo and enabled Build Scan publishing it was pretty obvious what's going on. The Build Scan for this action run shows the full set of Configurations that were resolved when executing the You can see that |
Ahhh that makes sense - I did not realise that configurations needed to be resolved out of band. Thanks for looking into this! |
Thanks for your work on this plugin!
I'm currently trying it out on one of my org's repositories (https://github.com/opencastsoftware/yvette) via the gradle-build-action integration.
I have noticed that if I set
DEPENDENCY_GRAPH_INCLUDE_CONFIGURATIONS
toruntimeClasspath
, I get an empty manifest:This does not agree with Gradle's output:
It was necessary to set the variable instead to
compileClasspath|runtimeClasspath
as suggested in gradle/gradle-build-action#803 to see all of my project's dependencies, but it would be much more ideal ifdependencies
and this plugin could agree about the dependencies of a given configuration.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: