Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: [release-3.1.x] docs: Replace shortcodes on Storage topic #14228

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2024
Merged

chore: [release-3.1.x] docs: Replace shortcodes on Storage topic #14228

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
24 changes: 12 additions & 12 deletions docs/sources/configure/storage.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -85,35 +85,35 @@ You may use any substitutable services, such as those that implement the S3 API

Cassandra is a popular database and one of the possible chunk stores for Loki and is production safe.

{{< collapse title="Title of hidden content" >}}
{{< admonition type="note" >}}
This storage type for chunks is deprecated and may be removed in future major versions of Loki.
{{< /collapse >}}
{{< /admonition >}}

## Index storage

### Cassandra (deprecated)

Cassandra can also be utilized for the index store and aside from the [boltdb-shipper](https://grafana.com/docs/loki/<LOKI_VERSION>/operations/storage/boltdb-shipper/), it's the only non-cloud offering that can be used for the index that's horizontally scalable and has configurable replication. It's a good candidate when you already run Cassandra, are running on-prem, or do not wish to use a managed cloud offering.

{{< collapse title="Title of hidden content" >}}
{{< admonition type="note" >}}
This storage type for indexes is deprecated and may be removed in future major versions of Loki.
{{< /collapse >}}
{{< /admonition >}}

### BigTable (deprecated)

Bigtable is a cloud database offered by Google. It is a good candidate for a managed index store if you're already using it (due to its heavy fixed costs) or wish to run in GCP.

{{< collapse title="Title of hidden content" >}}
{{< admonition type="note" >}}
This storage type for indexes is deprecated and may be removed in future major versions of Loki.
{{< /collapse >}}
{{< /admonition >}}

### DynamoDB (deprecated)

DynamoDB is a cloud database offered by AWS. It is a good candidate for a managed index store, especially if you're already running in AWS.

{{< collapse title="Title of hidden content" >}}
{{< admonition type="note" >}}
This storage type for indexes is deprecated and may be removed in future major versions of Loki.
{{< /collapse >}}
{{< /admonition >}}

#### Rate limiting

Expand All @@ -123,9 +123,9 @@ DynamoDB is susceptible to rate limiting, particularly due to overconsuming what

BoltDB is an embedded database on disk. It is not replicated and thus cannot be used for high availability or clustered Loki deployments, but is commonly paired with a `filesystem` chunk store for proof of concept deployments, trying out Loki, and development. The [boltdb-shipper](https://grafana.com/docs/loki/<LOKI_VERSION>/operations/storage/boltdb-shipper/) aims to support clustered deployments using `boltdb` as an index.

{{< collapse title="Title of hidden content" >}}
{{< admonition type="note" >}}
This storage type for indexes is deprecated and may be removed in future major versions of Loki.
{{< /collapse >}}
{{< /admonition >}}

## Schema Config

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -440,9 +440,9 @@ storage_config:

### On premise deployment (Cassandra+Cassandra)

{{< collapse title="Title of hidden content" >}}
{{< admonition type="note" >}}
Cassandra as storage backend for chunks and indexes is deprecated.
{{< /collapse >}}
{{< /admonition >}}

**Keeping this for posterity, but this is likely not a common config. Cassandra should work and could be faster in some situations but is likely much more expensive.**

Expand Down
Loading