You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Today I've been running benchmarks and on small data sets H2 is inserting then selecting a subset 14x quicker than DuckDB.
I've got a data engine written in java that uses H2 as a backend. It allows performing selects against streaming data and other databases. So my use case is unique in that I create lots of small tables 100s of time per second, query them, then drop the table. I wanted to look at using DuckDB as the parquet querying is really useful to my users but H2 is so much faster I wouldn't change.
To be fair to DuckDB they are targeted at much larger data, are having to cross the java memory barrier and I wasn't using their custom appender.
Anyway just wanted to share the news and say Thanks.
👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Today I've been running benchmarks and on small data sets H2 is inserting then selecting a subset 14x quicker than DuckDB.
I've got a data engine written in java that uses H2 as a backend. It allows performing selects against streaming data and other databases. So my use case is unique in that I create lots of small tables 100s of time per second, query them, then drop the table. I wanted to look at using DuckDB as the parquet querying is really useful to my users but H2 is so much faster I wouldn't change.
To be fair to DuckDB they are targeted at much larger data, are having to cross the java memory barrier and I wasn't using their custom appender.
Anyway just wanted to share the news and say Thanks.
👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: