You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looks like we can perhaps use MEGNet as a backend in automatminer, since it looks like you can use whatever atom/bond feature vectors you desire. Although not sure it would fit in the automatminer framework bc the atomic feature vectors are inputs to the graph...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ardunn
changed the title
Compare against MEGNet (or allow use as backend)
Use MEGNet/CGCNN as backend?
Feb 8, 2019
https://github.com/materialsvirtuallab/megnet
Looks like we can perhaps use MEGNet as a backend in automatminer, since it looks like you can use whatever atom/bond feature vectors you desire. Although not sure it would fit in the automatminer framework bc the atomic feature vectors are inputs to the graph...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: