Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

++robustness and usefulness of featurizer sets #98

Closed
ardunn opened this issue Oct 19, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

++robustness and usefulness of featurizer sets #98

ardunn opened this issue Oct 19, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
@utf

Comments

@ardunn
Copy link
Contributor

ardunn commented Oct 19, 2018

Featurizer sets should include more featurizers. The "best" sets should, for example, include multiple instances of the same class (e.g. StructureFeaturizers.best should probably have multiple SiteStatsFingerprints)
@ardunn
Copy link
Contributor Author

ardunn commented Oct 19, 2018

Oops this is a duplicate

@ardunn ardunn closed this as completed Oct 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@utf utf

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@utf @ardunn