Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump version of miekg/dns to 1.0.4 #3978

Closed

Conversation

pierresouchay
Copy link
Contributor

See #3977

While trying to improve furthermore #3948 (This pull request is still valid since we are not using Compression to compute the result anyway).

I saw a strange behaviour of dns library.
Basically, msg.Len() and len(msg.Pack()) disagree on Message len.

Thus, calculation of DNS response is false consul relies on msg.Len() instead of the result of Pack()

This is linked to miekg/dns#453 and a fix has been provided with miekg/dns#454

Would it be possible to upgrade miekg/dns to a more recent function ?

Consul might for instance upgrade to a post 1.0 release such as https://github.com/miekg/dns/releases/tag/v1.0.4

See hashicorp#3977

While trying to improve furthermore hashicorp#3948 (This pull request is still valid since we are not using Compression to compute the result anyway).

I saw a strange behaviour of dns library.
Basically, msg.Len() and len(msg.Pack()) disagree on Message len.

Thus, calculation of DNS response is false consul relies on msg.Len() instead of the result of Pack()

This is linked to miekg/dns#453 and a fix has been provided with miekg/dns#454

Would it be possible to upgrade miekg/dns to a more recent function ?

Consul might for instance upgrade to a post 1.0 release such as https://github.com/miekg/dns/releases/tag/v1.0.4
@preetapan
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this in favor of #3995 (preserves the commits in here)

@preetapan preetapan closed this Mar 28, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants