Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UI: Specialized Job Detail Pages #3829

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Feb 7, 2018
Merged

Conversation

DingoEatingFuzz
Copy link
Contributor

Tailored job detail pages based on the type of job. Features include:

  1. Periodic launches and parameterized dispatches are no long in the root job list
  2. Periodic and parameterized jobs are labeled as such in the root job list
  3. The summary chart in the root job list now charts children rather than allocations for periodic and parameterized jobs
  4. Periodic detail page lists all periodic launches
  5. Parameterized detail page lists all dispatches
  6. Breadcrumbs for child jobs link back to parent jobs
  7. Parameterized child detail page includes the dispatch payload
  8. Periodic child detail page has a "force launch" button for quickly running the job out of band of the cron setting

Closes #3510

screen shot 2018-02-02 at 10 05 17 am

screen shot 2018-02-02 at 10 05 46 am

screen shot 2018-02-02 at 10 06 13 am

screen shot 2018-02-02 at 10 06 25 am

screen shot 2018-02-02 at 10 06 40 am

Copy link
Member

@alisdair alisdair left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks really good! 🎉 I clicked around the UI locally and it all worked nicely. Didn't try too hard to break anything. (Wow, the dev Mirage server sure takes a while to start up, huh?)

I really like the multi-component structure. It's much clearer than the multiple-nested-if alternative. Test coverage seems great too.

Left a few questions & comments while reading through the code, but nothing important.

import { computed } from '@ember/object';
import DistributionBar from './distribution-bar';

export default DistributionBar.extend({
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I might be misreading this, but would it be possible to use composition instead of inheritance here? That is, have this component (and the other subclass) render {{distribution-bar data=data}}?

It would mean rendering another component, but it might be clearer to understand the code that way. It took me a while to figure out how this subclass interacted with the parent.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I definitely agree it would be clearer and more idiomatic. I just still have a gut aversion to making extra components. Especially when those components are in lists.

There are no lists in Nomad long enough to cause component allocation to drag the app though, so I shouldn't prematurely optimize.

args: ['jobs.job', job],
},
];
}),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again wondering if composition is an option here. All of the templates have the same breadcrumbs markup, so if this logic was pulled into a component, there might be no need for an abstract parent class.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactoring all of breadcrumbs is in my top three things to do. I'd prefer to leave this the way it is, understanding full well that it is strange and out of place, and clean it up when I refactor all of breadcrumbs.

@@ -49,6 +108,12 @@ export default Model.extend({
runningChildren: attr('number'),
deadChildren: attr('number'),

childrenList: collect('pendingChildren', 'runningChildren', 'deadChildren'),

totalChildren: sum('childrenList'),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fancy! 💅

hash.ParentID = JSON.stringify([hash.ParentID, hash.NamespaceID || 'default']);
}

// Periodic is a boolean on list and an object on single
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😬

Enabled: true,
ProhibitOverlap: true,
Spec: '*/5 * * * * *',
SpecType: 'ctron',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not important, but should this be 'cron'?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lol, yes.

const sum = (list, key) => list.reduce((sum, item) => sum + get(item, key), 0);
moduleForJob('Acceptance | job detail (batch)', () => server.create('job', { type: 'batch' }));
moduleForJob('Acceptance | job detail (system)', () => server.create('job', { type: 'system' }));
moduleForJob('Acceptance | job detail (periodic)', () => server.create('job', 'periodic'));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a really interesting way to test very similar pages! Will be stealing this for some upcoming TFE tests.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It works, but I'd prefer something that is a little more qunit-y. I sorta fell back into my mocha comfort zone when writing this and nested related tests in the moduleForJob function rather than setting some global context with moduleForJob and calling the tests right below it.

onClick=(action gotoTaskGroup row.model)}}
{{/t.body}}
{{/list-table}}
{{/list-pagination}}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see any pagination controls being rendered for this list-pagination instance. Why is it being used?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good eyes. I must have copied this from the children component which does actually have pagination.

.filterBy('method', 'POST')
.find(req => req.url === `/v1/job/${id}/periodic/force?namespace=${namespace}`),
'POST request was made'
);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I often prefer asserting about the state of the Mirage DB over looking at logged requests. It helps me be more sure that the request body was correct (and that my Mirage handler was exercised). For example, in this case I think you could assert that a periodicChild record was created for the job.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call! This is the first POST in the UI, so I haven't had to write a test like this with Mirage yet.

@DingoEatingFuzz
Copy link
Contributor Author

I addressed everything I said I would, @alisdair. I'm not sure if I like using composition over inheritance for the chart components now that I've gone through the exercise of writing it. It ends up being pretty repetitive and burdened by its own gotchas (e.g., plumbing the class and any other attributes down to the inner distribution-bar).

Those changes are all in the last commit if you want to exam it directly.

@alisdair
Copy link
Member

alisdair commented Feb 6, 2018

Yeah, agreed, I'm not sure the composition approach is much cleaner. I didn't notice you were conditionally rendering the legend or yielding, that makes it much more difficult.

I don't have any ideas for improving it further. Sorry the suggestion wasn't useful!

@DingoEatingFuzz
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm glad you brought it up! It was worth trying despite it not panning out.

@DingoEatingFuzz DingoEatingFuzz merged commit ea9ff98 into master Feb 7, 2018
@DingoEatingFuzz DingoEatingFuzz deleted the f-ui-specialized-job-pages branch February 7, 2018 01:48
@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 13, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants