You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This result is as I expected. It seems in line with what I'd expect from bin packing. Additionally, my understanding is that the spread stanza would work on multiple groups/tasks specified within the same job and not across a children of a parameterized job like in this case.
The linked issue below mentions that "Spread at the cluster level is in a future roadmap".
That may be the solution to this request and tracking that issue may make this one redundant, but I wanted to specifically request that parameterized jobs are supported for spread-style scheduling so that in the future this experiment might result in more like ~100 allocs spread across the 9 clients.
We definitely want to support this usecase. You are correct in that cluster wide spreading will bring this desired functionality to dispatched jobs. Dispatched jobs, to the scheduler, appear as distinct unique jobs, so there is no specially casing that would cause cluster wide spread to not apply here.
I'm going to close this since it does dup the requested feature in #3690 so please head over there and 👍 the issue. We those reactions into account often when planning out our roadmap.
That may be the solution to this request and tracking that issue may make this one redundant, but I wanted to specifically request that parameterized jobs are supported for spread-style scheduling
I'm really interested in this specific use case too. 💪
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.
Experiment:
Job:
Script:
Version:
Result:
This result is as I expected. It seems in line with what I'd expect from bin packing. Additionally, my understanding is that the spread stanza would work on multiple groups/tasks specified within the same job and not across a children of a parameterized job like in this case.
Feature Request:
The linked issue below mentions that "Spread at the cluster level is in a future roadmap".
That may be the solution to this request and tracking that issue may make this one redundant, but I wanted to specifically request that parameterized jobs are supported for spread-style scheduling so that in the future this experiment might result in more like ~100 allocs spread across the 9 clients.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: