Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use debug logging for scheduler internals #6849

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 12, 2019
Merged

Conversation

preetapan
Copy link
Member

We currently log an error if preemption is unable to find a suitable set of
allocations to preempt. This commit changes that to debug level since not finding
preemptable allocations is not an error condition.

We currently log an error if preemption is unable to find a suitable set of
allocations to preempt. This commit changes that to debug level since not finding
preemptable allocations is not an error condition.
Copy link
Contributor

@notnoop notnoop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm.

Looks like we can remove these logs as well? I see that we've been mostly logging actual errors in scheduler - e.g. we don't log when a node is over-utilized or not meeting constraints (these get propagated through ctx fields:

$ git rev-parse HEAD
7cda14098104adc56386c13ee2ced34952f02cf6
$ git grep iter.ctx.Logger
scheduler/feasible.go:          iter.ctx.Logger().Named("distinct_hosts").Error("failed to get proposed allocations", "error", err)
scheduler/rank.go:                      iter.ctx.Logger().Named("binpack").Error("failed retrieving proposed allocations", "error", err)
scheduler/rank.go:                                      iter.ctx.Logger().Named("binpack").Error("preemption not possible ", "network_resource", ask)
scheduler/rank.go:                                      iter.ctx.Logger().Named("binpack").Error("unexpected error, unable to create network offer after considering preemption", "error", err)
scheduler/rank.go:                                              iter.ctx.Logger().Named("binpack").Error("preemption not possible ", "network_resource", ask)
scheduler/rank.go:                                              iter.ctx.Logger().Named("binpack").Error("unexpected error, unable to create network offer after considering preemption", "error", err)
scheduler/rank.go:                                              iter.ctx.Logger().Named("binpack").Error("preemption not possible", "requested_device", req)
scheduler/rank.go:                                              iter.ctx.Logger().Named("binpack").Error("unexpected error, unable to create device offer after considering preemption", "error", err)
scheduler/rank.go:                      iter.ctx.Logger().Named("job_anti_affinity").Error("failed retrieving proposed allocations", "error", err)
scheduler/spread.go:                            iter.ctx.Logger().Named("spread").Warn("error building spread attributes for task group", "task_group", tgName, "error", errorMsg)

@preetapan
Copy link
Member Author

preetapan commented Dec 12, 2019

@notnoop The failed retrieving proposed allocations should stay as Error because that can only happen if there's a state store error, and that's worth being noisy about.

I'll downgrade the other errors to Debug.

@preetapan preetapan merged commit 37d421e into master Dec 12, 2019
@preetapan preetapan deleted the b-debug-preemption branch December 12, 2019 22:15
@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants