Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Encryption at rest for DynamoDB #3298

Closed
ewbankkit opened this issue Feb 8, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #3303
Closed

Feature request: Encryption at rest for DynamoDB #3298

ewbankkit opened this issue Feb 8, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #3303
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. service/dynamodb Issues and PRs that pertain to the dynamodb service.

Comments

@ewbankkit
Copy link
Contributor

Encryption at rest just released for DynamoDB.
Add support to the aws_dynamodb_table data source and resource.

@ewbankkit
Copy link
Contributor Author

Requires v1.12.73 of the AWS SDK for Go.

@radeksimko radeksimko added enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. service/dynamodb Issues and PRs that pertain to the dynamodb service. labels Feb 11, 2018
@satyanerella
Copy link

Would it be possible to know when this PR would be into the release.

@AlexCousens
Copy link

Would also very much like this feature ASAP please!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 7, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 7, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. service/dynamodb Issues and PRs that pertain to the dynamodb service.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants