google_storage_transfer_job -- notification_config field

[jcanseco]

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment. If the issue is assigned to the "modular-magician" user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. If the issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. If the issue is assigned to "hashibot", a community member has claimed the issue already.

Description

We'd like to request support for a notification_config field in google_storage_transfer_job to more closely reflect the API's TransferJob resource which supports a notificationConfig field.

New or Affected Resource(s)

• google_storage_transfer_job

Potential Terraform Configuration

# Propose what you think the configuration to take advantage of this feature should look like.
# We may not use it verbatim, but it's helpful in understanding your intent.

resource "google_storage_transfer_job" "transfer-job" {
    description = "Sample storage transfer job"
    transfer_spec {
        gcs_data_sink {
            bucket_name = "my-sink-bucket"
        }
        gcs_data_source {
            bucket_name = "my-source-bucket"
        }
    }
    schedule {
        schedule_start_date {
            year    = 2020
            month   = 1
            day     = 1
        }
    }
    notification_config {
        pubsub_topic = "projects/my-project/topics/my-topic"
        event_types = ["TRANSFER_OPERATION_SUCCESS", "TRANSFER_OPERATION_FAILED"]
        payload_format = "JSON"
   }
}

References

• notificationConfig on StorageTransferJob GoogleCloudPlatform/k8s-config-connector#303

[ct-dh]

Any update on when this might be implemented? It seems a fairly small change in magic modules that would be quick to implement.

[hao-nan-li]

b/245746513

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.