Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

config: maintain slice index accounting for computed keys #10118

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2016

Conversation

mitchellh
Copy link
Contributor

@mitchellh mitchellh commented Nov 15, 2016

Fixes #10075
Fixes #10013

This should be cherry picked into maint-0.7 as well.

When interpolating, we were only maintaining the last known slice index.
If you had sibling slices then you could lose your slice index when
exiting the slice. The resulting behavior was that no some runs the
computed key would be: "slice.0.attr" and on others would be
"slice.attr", the latter being incorrect.

We now maintain a list of slice indexes so that as we unnest, we
properly restore the old value.

Surprisingly unrelated to the graph but the shadow graph caught this
which is great. :)

Fixes #10075
Fixes #10013

When interpolating, we were only maintaining the last known slice index.
If you had sibling slices then you could lose your slice index when
exiting the slice. The resulting behavior was that no some runs the
computed key would be: "slice.0.attr" and on others would be
"slice.attr", the latter being incorrect.

We now maintain a list of slice indexes so that as we unnest, we
properly restore the old value.

Surprisingly unrelated to the graph but the shadow graph caught this
which is great. :)
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 20, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 20, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Experimental feature failure: ReadDataDiff unequal configs Experimental feature failure!
2 participants