Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix winrm provisioner cacert option #14783

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2017
Merged

Conversation

jd3nn1s
Copy link
Contributor

@jd3nn1s jd3nn1s commented May 24, 2017

It appears that the cacert option for the winrm provisioner was
not getting passed correctly to the winrm package. Log output
showed that CACert was false regardless of configuration.

While the validation of the connector looked for cacert, the winrm
communicator looked for ca_cert.

@jd3nn1s
Copy link
Contributor Author

jd3nn1s commented Jun 8, 2017

Any chance this could be prioritized as a security issue? It forces the use of insecure = true with a private certificate authority.

It appears that the cacert option for the winrm provisioner was
not getting passed correctly to the winrm package. Log output
showed that CACert was false regardless of configuration.

While the validation of the connector looked for cacert, the winrm
communicator looked for ca_cert.
@apparentlymart
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for working on this @jd3nn1s, and sorry it got missed for review. 😖

@apparentlymart apparentlymart merged commit 21c9c2c into hashicorp:master Oct 23, 2017
@jd3nn1s
Copy link
Contributor Author

jd3nn1s commented Oct 24, 2017

No worries - thanks for terraform!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 6, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 6, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants