Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

provider/aws: Skip detaching when aws_internet_gateway not found #8454

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2016
Merged

provider/aws: Skip detaching when aws_internet_gateway not found #8454

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2016

Conversation

Bowbaq
Copy link
Contributor

@Bowbaq Bowbaq commented Aug 24, 2016

Deleting an aws_internet_gateway intermittently fails because the gateway fails to detach, and this is considered an error.

The gateway should only be deleted by terraform after it is detached, so there's no reason for it to disappear at this stage in the normal flow. This makes InvalidInternetGatewayID.NotFound a retryable error.

@stack72
Copy link
Contributor

stack72 commented Sep 3, 2016

Hey @Bowbaq

Thanks for the work here :) This is a valid use case and the tests are looking good!

% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSInternetGateway_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/09/04 00:48:48 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSInternetGateway_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSInternetGateway_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSInternetGateway_importBasic (53.18s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSInternetGateway_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSInternetGateway_basic (100.03s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSInternetGateway_delete
--- PASS: TestAccAWSInternetGateway_delete (75.74s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSInternetGateway_tags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSInternetGateway_tags (83.93s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws    312.902s

Paul

@stack72 stack72 merged commit 2b0de3c into hashicorp:master Sep 3, 2016
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 22, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 22, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants