Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add configurable probe values #387

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 15, 2020
Merged

Add configurable probe values #387

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 15, 2020

Conversation

jasonodonnell
Copy link
Contributor

This makes hardcoded probe values configurable with some defaults out of the box so users can configure readiness/liveness probes for their environment.

Copy link
Contributor

@tomhjp tomhjp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

values.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
values.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
jasonodonnell and others added 2 commits September 14, 2020 12:04
Co-authored-by: Tom Proctor <tomhjp@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tom Proctor <tomhjp@users.noreply.github.com>
values.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Theron Voran <tvoran@users.noreply.github.com>
values.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +240 to +245
# How often (in seconds) to perform the probe
periodSeconds: 5
# Minimum consecutive successes for the probe to be considered successful after having failed
successThreshold: 1
# Number of seconds after which the probe times out.
timeoutSeconds: 3

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

was this desired to swap period and timeout values? It was timeout:5 and period:3 before that PR.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, as discussed here: #387 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants