-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 697
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add focused, synthetic, future-proof autoconf scripts test #7762
Comments
Maybe the effort should be focused in add ci jobs in essential packages using autoconf using cabal head or at least release candidates, which are available via ghcup and haskell actions |
Yes, I agree, cheaper is better, because we lack resources. I think it would be even stronger (than focused tests on our side) if a couple of popular packages had CI jobs that:
Newest stable cabal for all 4 modes of test should probably be enough, because we don't plan to change this part and, if autoconf breaks again, we will again try to fix cabal ahead of the changes being picked up by normal packages. |
Ok, we could open issues in the chosen packages (particularly network) suggesting those changes in their ci setup |
Some work has already been done in package network by @hasufell: haskell/network#516 I don't know how much is missing. |
@Mikolaj suggestion in irc and recorded in #7671
Not sure how feasible could be the setup for those tests, specially the first mentioned ones. Otoh network is being tested in the new dogfooding job (see #7742)
To consider.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: