-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Are the parameters for "300K Random Images " vs. "80m TinyImaget" same. #22
Comments
Thanks for the contribution. |
Could you please answer our questions. Thanks. |
Hi, the 300K images were randomly selected after excluding images from the CIFAR, Places, and LSUN classes, as well as images with divisive metadata, from the 80 Million Tiny Images dataset. No further modifications were made. Thank you. |
Thanks for the response. I would like to ask whether the traning hyperparameters (e.g. learning rate, ...) used for "300K Random Images " and "80m TinyImaget" are the same when performing model training. Because if the hyperparameters are not changed and just "300K Random Images" is used instead of "80m TinyImaget", the performance of the model degrades very significantly. |
We didn't tune any hyperparameter on 300K. Can you share some of the results you've obtained? |
Hi, thank you for your insightful work.
I wonder Are the parameters for "300K Random Images " vs. "80m TinyImaget" same?
When i reproduce the results, i find that directly replacing "80m TinyImaget" with "300K Random Images " brings significant performance degradation.
Thanks a lot.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: