Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 15, 2018. It is now read-only.

Add the OSMAnd .obf file format to the Export Tool #18

Closed
mataharimhairi opened this issue Feb 16, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Add the OSMAnd .obf file format to the Export Tool #18

mataharimhairi opened this issue Feb 16, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@mataharimhairi
Copy link
Collaborator

Proposed by: Mhairi O'Hara

Summary: Currently other services are relied on to update OSMAnd during activations. Allowing users to update this themselves through the HOT Exports Tool would help make activations more effective.

Skills Required: Ruby on Rails, Perl, Shell, SQLite, PostgreSQL, HTML5, CSS

Possible Mentors: ???

Notes: This project proposal is taken from the hot-exports, where it is listed as issue #77.

@cgiovando
Copy link
Contributor

@dodobas can you estimate the time and skills required for this project? @mataharimhairi we should make sure these project ideas are worth three months of coding if we tag them for GSoC.

Any developer from the project that we can ask about mentoring?

@bgirardot
Copy link

I haven't had a chance to look at these hot export server ideas yet, but one thing to keep in mind is that the software runs on geofabrik hardware somewhere. I have tried to get it installed on my local machine but never had any luck, but I am not a Ruby on Rails developer.

@mataharimhairi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@cgiovando Yes, I totally agree. We will have to see if this job is realistic for a 3 month internship, otherwise it can't be used as a project proposal. I thought I would add it as an issue (project idea) first, so that we might get some feed back on it, which hopefully Dražen can help us with!

@dodobas
Copy link
Collaborator

dodobas commented Feb 19, 2015

This should be merged with #17

@mataharimhairi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I have merged this project idea with issue #17.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants