-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HOT enhancement requests for Esri World imagery MORE than welcome #118
Comments
@jgravois 👋 awesome, thanks for the issue here. Yes, I will drop in some ideas here, I think that's a great idea. More shortly but they revolve around some improved workflows into the Tasking Manager and then also some potential offline use with OpenMapKit.
Sounds interesting and curious to know more about the idea |
awesome @smit1678!
Besides the blog post i linked to previously, the app below is probably the best way to get familiar with Esri's Wayback Imagery service. if you think having access to historic imagery (back to 2014) in iD to compare/contrast with whatever is fresh could be useful, just say the word. |
Hi @jgravois Thank you very much for your offer. The two most important things to me as someone who creates projects are, native or effective zoom level, date of the imagery at max zoom level (this often changes in DG imagery layers between z17 and z18), and what area the imagery covers. At the moment, most Esri imagery seems to go up to about z17. If there was anyway to get native or good effective z18 that would help mappers a lot. I might have those numbers off by one, but Esri World imagery is just one zoom level short of what we usually work with from DG and a bit more difficult for mappers to map from as a result. As to the date of the imagery, there is a website we use to determine the date: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=c03a526d94704bfb839445e80de95495 A minor improvement would be to have the capture date available in the meta data of the imagery tiles themselves. Then we could get an idea right in our native tool (JOSM). However, an other big improvement would be to allow the download of the imagery footprint so we could build projects around the Esri imagery exactly. Often time 2017 imagery will border something much older like 2012 so only working in the area of the 2017 is important. See this example, the blue outline would be what we want to download: Thank you and thank Esri very much, Esri Worldwide imagery, is often the newest available and works well for us generaly. |
metadata
i actually PRed this feature in iD last year. it is activated via ⌘ Cmd/Ctrl + ⇧ Shift + B the information isn't encoded into the actual tiles, but it is accessible via spatial web queries so i'd be happy to act as a resource if you can find someone interested in porting the code into JOSM.
you could certainly fetch these features as JSON via spatial web queries and display the information in JOSM. would it be helpful for me to write up a quick prototype in Leaflet to outline the flow? higher resolution imageryEsri's catalog is a composite of commercial sources and photography contributed to our Community Maps Program. we're always pursuing higher quality and more recent content but in the remote areas where you guys and gals work its not super likely you'll start to see significantly higher resolution stuff getting served up. |
closing, but always happy to keep the discussion alive. |
Hey y'all 👋!
it was brought to my attention that Esri World Imagery was used in ~1/3 of HOT projects in 2018. that is awesome!
because of htis, i decided to drop a line here and mention that there are definitely developers (and aspiring developers) at Esri that would be interested in adding capabilities/metadata if y'all have any specific asks.
ref:
openstreetmap/iD#5116
openstreetmap/iD#4335
one idea of mine:
we also already have an iD PR languishing that adds the ability to selectively import and QA authoritative spatial data served from Esri web services. if there is potential that this work could be beneficial in a humanitarian context, all the better.
disclaimer: i signed up quite awhile back to get myself invited to tech working group meetings but i've never gotten off my butt to actually dial into one. if that would be the more appropriate venue to talk through details, just say the word.
cc @quincylvania @slibby
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: