We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CC CUDA SP #50, SP faster LocalInho #86 , #92
From #119 (review) :
I'm evaluation the performance impact of ND vs 1D, where algorithmically the 1D is really simpler.
[ RUN ] HelloSPTPTest.performance starting test. DIM_INPUT=10000, DIM=2048, CELLS=10 EPOCHS = 1000 starting: 1000 iterations.Total elapsed time = 0 seconds [ OK ] HelloSPTPTest.performance (1027 ms) [----------] 1 test from HelloSPTPTest (1027 ms total)
[ RUN ] HelloSPTPTest.performance starting test. DIM_INPUT=10000, DIM=2048, CELLS=10 EPOCHS = 1000 starting: 1000 iterations.Total elapsed time = 74 seconds /home/mmm/devel/HTM/htm-community/nupic.cpp/src/test/unit/algorithms/HelloSPTPTest.cpp:101: Failure Value of: timeTotal <= CI_avg_time Actual: false Expected: true HelloSPTP test slower than expected! (74,should be 45 [ FAILED ] HelloSPTPTest.performance (74195 ms) [----------] 1 test from HelloSPTPTest (74195 ms total)
[ RUN ] HelloSPTPTest.performance starting test. DIM_INPUT=10000, DIM=2048, CELLS=10 EPOCHS = 1000 starting: 1000 iterations.Total elapsed time = 75 seconds /home/mmm/devel/HTM/htm-community/nupic.cpp/src/test/unit/algorithms/HelloSPTPTest.cpp:101: Failure Value of: timeTotal <= CI_avg_time Actual: false Expected: true HelloSPTP test slower than expected! (75,should be 45 [ FAILED ] HelloSPTPTest.performance (75335 ms) [----------] 1 test from HelloSPTPTest (75335 ms total)
TL;DR
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks to PR #769 local inhibition (only for wrapAround=true) is now 2x faster!
wrapAround=true
local inhibition is very slow! 70x (1s vs 74s global/local inhibition)
which equals to improvement and it's now only 10x slower than global inh!
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
CC CUDA SP #50, SP faster LocalInho #86 , #92
From #119 (review) :
I'm evaluation the performance impact of ND vs 1D, where algorithmically the 1D is really simpler.
TL;DR
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: