-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 731
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update compiler #357
Comments
The issue is, that class file formats are forwards compatible, so the lowest common denominator is in most cases the best pick. I'm getting the impression that the new features aren't that important to this project, or at least not more important than compatibility. |
If somebody proposes a change where Java 6 + is really required, I am sure it will be considered. I do not see much need in enforcing the version until that though it would be possible to refactor the code a bit |
To make closeable client? I think it easier to fork this library. |
It is a reasonable improvement. So just create a PR ;) |
I agree with @oleg-nenashev Updating class file version first is like a cart before a horse. Let somebody propose a change that benefits from newer version of Java. |
With JDK 5 being end of life for many many years, it is time to move to JDK 8. I think you should create a branch for JDK 8 and even JDK 9, so contributors can use the newer JDK.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: