You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The c# language generator will generate function stubs in Functions.g.cs pointing to implementations, but the implementations will need to be authored by hand. I did a review of the amount of effort required to generate these functions automatically and it amounts to writing a full code transpiler from the function language used in the IFC EXPRESS schema to the target language. Although this would be great, and is supported by the current grammar, it seems like we can make a one time implementation of these functions manually, then commit them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The c# language generator will generate function stubs in
Functions.g.cs
pointing to implementations, but the implementations will need to be authored by hand. I did a review of the amount of effort required to generate these functions automatically and it amounts to writing a full code transpiler from the function language used in the IFC EXPRESS schema to the target language. Although this would be great, and is supported by the current grammar, it seems like we can make a one time implementation of these functions manually, then commit them.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: