-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Go fixed asset implementation doesn't work with the rich query or range query workloads #189
Comments
with fixed asset base I also run into problems.
|
Chaincode logs:
|
More espicative error messages using the legacy node sdk:
|
sometimes even the creation of the assets fails:
|
just run the node fixed asset chaincode as well and it actually give same error that you reported by dkelsey for the java one:
|
The node chaincode uses default parameters while the go one doesn't In the benchmark we do provide only the required parameters(2 out of 3 for rich query and 3 out of 4 for range query), which works for the node chaincode that has the last parameter as an optional default one while it does not work for the go one. However, if you try to actually set the third parameter (forth for range query) the go one works fine but the node one doesn't I'll go ahead removing the optional parameter from the node chaincode and provide all of the arguments in the benchmark call. I'll go ahead removing the optional parameter from the node chaincode and provide all of the arguments in the benchmark call |
Similar to Java for the contract api implementation you get the error
Need to see what happens with fixed-asset-base where the contract-api doesn't check the parameters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: