Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[suggestion] Support TOML configuration #3499

Closed
0x009922 opened this issue May 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

[suggestion] Support TOML configuration #3499

0x009922 opened this issue May 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
config-changes Changes in configuration and start up of the Iroha Enhancement New feature or request iroha2-dev The re-implementation of a BFT hyperledger in RUST

Comments

@0x009922
Copy link
Contributor

0x009922 commented May 21, 2023

Feature request

Probably, use only TOML, because supporting both JSON and TOML might overcomplicate documentation (e.g. the need to provide examples for both formats). Focusing on a single format might net a better docs quality.

Motivation

TOML is a friendlier configuration format than JSON and even JSON5. It is the standard Rust configuration format.

@0x009922 0x009922 added Enhancement New feature or request iroha2-dev The re-implementation of a BFT hyperledger in RUST config-changes Changes in configuration and start up of the Iroha labels May 21, 2023
@0x009922
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closed by #4239

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
config-changes Changes in configuration and start up of the Iroha Enhancement New feature or request iroha2-dev The re-implementation of a BFT hyperledger in RUST
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant