[fix] #2150: Use rustfmt
instead of cargo fmt
in client/build.rs
#2187
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Daniil Polyakov arjentix@gmail.com
Description of the Change
cargo fmt
usage was replaced byrustfmt
directly. This is a more clean way to avoid cargo recursion problem (instead of just removingCARGO_RECURSION
env-variable)Issue
rustfmt
#2150Benefits
More legal way to solve cargo recursion problem for formatting smartcontract
Possible Drawbacks
Maybe non-trivial for multi-files smartcontracts