-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Big fix for codegen when Array of struct and struct used together #2068
Conversation
return ((internalType == null ? type : internalType.isEmpty() ? type : internalType) | ||
+ components.stream() | ||
.map(namedType -> String.valueOf(namedType.structIdentifier())) | ||
.collect(Collectors.joining())) | ||
.hashCode(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hashCode does not have uniqueness Property, it could subject to quite significant collision as a identifier
Signed-off-by: tonykwok1992 <tonykwok1992@gmail.com>
6e75649
to
3d0a0b2
Compare
Signed-off-by: tonykwok1992 <tonykwok1992@gmail.com>
1363404
to
5c49ed3
Compare
Signed-off-by: tonykwok1992 <tonykwok1992@gmail.com>
@@ -587,10 +587,6 @@ private List<TypeSpec> buildStructTypes(final List<AbiDefinition> functionDefini | |||
private static String getStructName(String internalType) { | |||
final String fullStructName = internalType.substring(internalType.lastIndexOf(" ") + 1); | |||
String tempStructName = fullStructName.substring(fullStructName.lastIndexOf(".") + 1); | |||
int arrayPos = tempStructName.indexOf("["); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was added in my previous PR merged https://github.com/hyperledger/web3j/pull/2061/files#diff-11944d4d901c6c86e0bb4f4bb1af18f9b3644a325a39e7cc7437878613330294R590
However, after fixing normalizeNamedType
to handle static array, this is no longer needed, although there is no harm to leave it there
@@ -637,7 +646,7 @@ private List<AbiDefinition.NamedType> extractStructs( | |||
parameters.addAll(definition.getOutputs()); | |||
return parameters.stream() | |||
.map(this::normalizeNamedType) | |||
.filter(namedType -> namedType.getType().startsWith("tuple")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was added in my previous PR merged https://github.com/hyperledger/web3j/pull/2061/files#diff-11944d4d901c6c86e0bb4f4bb1af18f9b3644a325a39e7cc7437878613330294R590
However, after fixing normalizeNamedType
to handle static array, this is no longer needed, although there is no harm to leave it there
@@ -620,6 +617,18 @@ private NamedType normalizeNamedType(NamedType namedType) { | |||
.getInternalType() | |||
.substring(0, namedType.getInternalType().length() - 2), | |||
namedType.isIndexed()); | |||
} else if (namedType.getType().startsWith("tuple[") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Main change is to add handling for static array in normalizedType
2ed2336
to
3085bf1
Compare
Signed-off-by: tonykwok1992 <tonykwok1992@gmail.com>
f04562d
to
a77cc2b
Compare
Looks good from my side and also we really apreciate the effort! I'm not approving it yet because I want also to do some checks to make sure, but it should be fine as it is. |
What does this PR do?
After fixing #2061, there is still an edge case where array of struct and struct are used together in the same contract e.g
Foo
andFoo[2]
. Fix this by havingnormalizeNamedType
to take care of static arrayAlso, structIdentifer is using hashCode which does not have uniqueness Property, it could subject to quite significant collision.
This should also fix #2056. Added test case for the example in the issue
Where should the reviewer start?
All files
Why is it needed?
Bug fix
Checklist