Receiver-less operation #1742
Replies: 6 comments
-
You need to bypass this in the firmware. INAV does not support receiver-less operation. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for the info! I will do so, but will keep failsafe active for low battery and RTH action and just deactivate valid pulse rating initiating any failsafe and will then compile my own iNAV-RLO version. (RLO=receiver less operation....),+++ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If you manage to make it user-friendly and reliable - please consider submitting a PR into this repo - "RLO" would certainly be a great addition to INAV. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
+1 , RLO is usual in researchers' workflow. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@jstremmler how do you send command to 3DR-radio? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think RLO Could be very dangerous isn't it? I'd recommend using a receiver mod for bigger range or at least any kind of transmitter station that sends a valid signal out to the copter (without the need to control it manually) to have a physical range limitation here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I own a copter which from now on I only want to operate with a 3DR-radio and the existing SPRACINGF3 FC.
How do I avoid failsafe kicking in because I am always outside valid pulse range setting because I don't have any receiver on the copter?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions