You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@mwetter, I think that when we discussed this issue during the meeting, we were looking into the package organization of the Buildings library, where the package ThermalZones has four sub-packages: Detailed, EnergyPlus_9_6_0, ISO13790, and ReducedOrder. With this structure, it makes sense to put ISO13790 and VDI6007 under the sub-package ReducedOrder.
However, the package ThermalZones of the IBPSA library has currently only two sub-packages: ISO13790 and ReducedOrder. Should we simply replace the name ReducedOrder with VDI6007 then? The alternative is to have ThermalZones with only one sub-package ReducedOrder and two sub-sub-packages ISO13790 and VID6007.
@amaccarini : We should have in the IBPSA library the structure
ThermalZones
ReducedOrder
ISO13790
VDI6007
Then, Buildings and other libraries can put their own thermal zone models into the ThermalZones package, parallel to the ReducedOrder package (or they are free to put them into other packages as appropriate).
@amaccarini to move
ISO13790
toReducedOrder.ISO13790
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: