New feature DepthDiscontinuity

[JeffWootton]

This has been a long outstanding open discussion item. Original notes:

Note that there is a proposal for a Depth Discontinuity feature that is awaiting completion of the work of the DQWG on data quality before it is discussed further.

SHOM: Not seen anything in DQWG reports on this… I'm in favour of a new feature. More generally, in favour of deleting the "pseudo" lines (0.3mm large areas) (Caution areas and Maritime jurisdiction areas).

There is a requirement to determine if such a feature is still required, and if so what the data modelling, encoding guidance and portrayal. Not sure if this can be done in time for S-101 Edition 2.0.0.

[alvarosanuy]

Need to see the proposal first. Can it be shared here?

[Richard-Fowle]

DK are in favour of this new feature

[JeffWootton]

S-101PT12 Decision: Keep Issue open pending further discussions with the DQWG and within the S-101 Project Team. It was agreed that this would be addressed post-S-101 Edition 2.0.0.