Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

S-101 document referencing older versions of ISO 191xx standards #131

Open
forodd opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

S-101 document referencing older versions of ISO 191xx standards #131

forodd opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
documentation only Improvements or additions to documentation Post-Edition 2.0.0

Comments

@forodd
Copy link

forodd commented Feb 23, 2024

Don't know if this has been brought up before.

One of our "ISO-experts" had a look at the latest version of the S-101 PS (Edition 1.2.0.202301109) and noticed that the list of references in part 1.2 contains references to several ISO/TC211 standards that have been replaced by newer versions.

I know for sure that for some standards this is intentionally done so, but not sure its the case for all.

Some examples he found
ISO 19105:2022, (S-101 references 2000)
ISO 19107:2019 (S-101 references 2003)
ISO 19131:2022 (S-101 references 2008)
ISO 19157-1:2023 (S-101 references 2013)

Not sure this is an issue at all, and maybe not for 2.0.0 anyway, but comments anyone?

@DavidGrant-NIWC
Copy link

Agree this is not a pressing concern, but my comments are:

image

This should reference S-100 5.1. I don't think the ISO references are necessary unless they are explicitly referenced somewhere in the PS. The reference to S-100 should be enough since S-100 specifies the use of ISO standards:

S-100 normative references

image

S-101 vs. S-100 references to ISO standards listed in previous message

Standard S-101 agrees with S-100 Reference in S-100
ISO 19105 Why is this referenced in S-101? Unreferenced in S-100 other than in "Terms and definitions".
ISO 19107 Yes image
ISO 19131 No image
ISO 19157 No image

@TomRichardson6
Copy link

I would agree with Dave that we should remove references unless we specifically reference something as S-101 refers to these standards via S-100. A short statement explaining this may be useful. I think one further action here could be to prompt the S-100WG to consider tracking where S-100 is behind the ISO standard and monitoring this, it may be that we choose to stay on the older versions but it should be a considered view.

@DavidGrant-NIWC
Copy link

it may be that we choose to stay on the older versions but it should be a considered view.

In general, the newer standards add a tremendous amount of additional complexity with little benefit to S-100. Their use would impose additional implementation requirements on OEM's.

@JeffWootton JeffWootton added documentation only Improvements or additions to documentation Post-Edition 2.0.0 labels May 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation only Improvements or additions to documentation Post-Edition 2.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants