Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug when running on openwrt #266

Closed
rezad1393 opened this issue May 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

bug when running on openwrt #266

rezad1393 opened this issue May 27, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@rezad1393
Copy link

I used the instruction in README to compile for openwrt.
when I run it it shows a table and some info but very fast I get this error: (I stopped the proccess before it put too much error lines)

thread 'resolver' panicked at 'attempted to leave type `linked_hash_map::Node<trust_dns_proto::op::query::Query, dns_lru::LruValue>` uninitialized, which is invalid', /cargo/registry/src/git.luolix.top-1ecc6299db9ec823/linked-hash-map-0.5.2/src/lib.rs:174:52es. (DNS queries hidden).
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
thread 'resolver' panicked at 'attempted to leave type `linked_hash_map::Node<trust_dns_proto::op::query::Query, dns_lru::LruValue>` uninitialized, which is invalid', /cargo/registry/src/git.luolix.top-1ecc6299db9ec823/linked-hash-map-0.5.2/src/lib.rs:174:52
thread 'resolver' panicked at 'attempted to leave type `linked_hash_map::Node<trust_dns_proto::op::query::Query, dns_lru::LruValue>` uninitialized, which is invalid', /cargo/registry/src/git.luolix.top-1ecc6299db9ec823/linked-hash-map-0.5.2/src/lib.rs:174:52

and in between these lines there are process bandwidths two. so the app still tries to show the info but these errors litter the output.

maybe because it is the debug build by default in openwrt build?

@cyqsimon
Copy link
Collaborator

Can you please try to compile latest main and see if this issue persists? I think this might have been resolved by a dependency bump.

@cyqsimon
Copy link
Collaborator

This seems like a duplicate of #216. I'll redirect the discussion to over there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants