-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I have come across a problem, when the ration is set as 0.5 #1
Comments
Yeah sure! Let's connect on google meets. Convey the appropriate time as per Location. ( Also send a google meet link for the same ) Kindly, prefer keeping it between 13:00 to 20:00 ( IST ). It's been a bit of time since I have spent some time, working on it - but happy to discuss the problem and provide inputs. Thanks & Regards, |
hhh Thanks for your reply. You are kind and helpful. |
Okay, I will definitely look into the issue and respond back to you by 2nd August. ( will try to look into it ASAP ) |
i will try my best to find the solution |
hey Zhouziqun, thank you for waiting. However, I was unable to find out a viable solution for the problem. Were you able to solve it ? |
Don't worry about your communication - it would be the least we are concerned with. Thanks for the feedback, will try to respond back to you quickly this time - let me re-read & reconstruct the whole project |
Hello, I have run your code CSNET, Thank you for your work.
But I have some questions:
when the ratio =0.01, 0.05, 0.1, the code can achieve the same performance as papers, at the same time when the ration is higher such as 0.5, the psnr results are closer to 35.5+, a little lower than 40+db in the paper。
Maybe somewhere I made mistakes you know, or you have the same problems we can discuss to solve it.
Looking forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: