There is no longer a minUTxOValue protocol parameter in Alonzo, it was
deprecated at the end of the Mary era. However, the requirement that each
UTXO must contain an amount of ada that depends on the size of the entry is
still enforced in the Alonzo era.
The size-dependent minimum ada amount in a UTXO is still referred to as the min-ada-value, and
is now calculated using the Alonzo parameter coinsPerUTxOWord.
The formula for the min-ada-value calculation, for a UTXO containing an output txout, is:
utxoEntrySize (txout) * coinsPerUTxOWord
where
utxoEntrySize (txout) = utxoEntrySizeWithoutVal + size (v) + dataHashSize (dh)
The v variable is the token bundle inside the txout output.
The minimum ada value calculation relies on the size function for determining
the size of a token bundle or a lovelace value, which is described in
the Mary era min-value document.
The variable dh is the hash of the datum that is contained in the output. If there is
no datum, the hash is represented by Nothing, and takes up 0 space. If there
is a datum in the output, it takes up 10 words of memory space.
Note that the coinsPerUTxOWord is a protocol parameter and is subject to
change. The values utxoEntrySizeWithoutVal and dataHashSize (dh)
are fixed at least for the entire Alonzo era.
The following table gives the values of the constants used in the calculation above. Recall that
1 ada = 1,000,000 lovelace
| Ada-only min-utxo value | 1,000,000 lovelace |
utxoEntrySizeWithoutVal |
27 words |
coinsPerUTxOWord |
34,482 lovelace |
dataHashSize (dh), dh = Nothing |
0 words |
dataHashSize (dh), dh <> Nothing |
10 words |
** NO datum hash: **
One policyID, one 0-character asset name (i) |
One policyID, one 1-character asset name (ii) |
One PolicyID, three 1-character asset names (iii) |
Two PolicyIDs, one 0-character name (iv) |
Two PolicyIDs, one 1-character name for each (v) |
Three PolicyIDs, ninety-six 1-character names between them (total) (vi) |
|
| size of value | 11 | 12 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 173 |
utxoEntrySize |
38 | 39 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 200 |
minUTxO (in lovelace) |
1,310,316 | 1,344,798 | 1,448,244 | 1,482,726 | 1,517,208 | 6,896,400 |
** WITH datum hash: **
One policyID, one 0-character asset name (i) |
One PolicyID, three 32-character asset name (vii) |
Two PolicyIDs, one 0-character name (viii) |
|
| size of value | 11 | 26 | 16 |
utxoEntrySize |
48 | 63 | 53 |
minUTxO (in lovelace) |
1,655,136 | 2,172,366 | 1,827,546 |
The following are calculations of the sizes of token bundles (values)
described in the tables above. These are according to the size function
given in the min-ada-value document for the Mary era.
- :
6 + FLOOR(((1 * 12) + 0 + (1 * 28) + 7)/8, 1) = 11
- :
- :
6 + FLOOR(((1 * 12) + 1 + (1 * 28) + 7)/8, 1) = 12
- :
- :
6 + FLOOR(((3 * 12) + (3*1) + (1 * 28) + 7)/8, 1) = 15
- :
- :
6 + FLOOR(((2 * 12) + 0 + (2 * 28) + 7)/8, 1) = 16
- :
- :
6 + FLOOR(((2 * 12) + (1*2) + (2 * 28) + 7)/8, 1) = 17
- :
- :
6 + FLOOR(((96 * 12) + 96 + (3 * 28) + 7)/8, 1) = 173
- :
- :
6 + FLOOR(((3 * 12) + 96 + (1 * 28) + 7)/8, 1) = 26
- :
- :
6 + FLOOR(((3 * 12) + 96 + (1 * 28) + 7)/8, 1) = 16
- :
In addition to the min-ada-value requirement, the ledger enforces a constraint on the sizes of token bundles in transaction outputs. The reason for having this constraint is to ensure that any single output is, in most cases, not so big that a transaction attempting to spend it would have to exceed the maximum transaction size.
For this constraint, the size of the token bundle is not estimated (as for the min-ada-value constraint), but rather taken to be the size of the serialized representation of the token bundle. We do not provide a formula for the serialized size calculation here. The following protocol parameter gives this constraint, and has the following current value currently (subject to change):
maxValSize = 4000 bytes, ie. 500 words