You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After a discussion with @abailly-iohk , we thought that it would probably be of interest to keep mithril-core protocol agnostic. In the sense that we should not fit mithril-core to work only with Cardano.
Therefore, it would be better for the parsing of the opcert and kes keys to happen in the Mitrhil client and aggregator. Therefore, the verification that a given key is really associated to a PoolID should happen in the node.
I completely agree with keeping mithril-core agnostic and handle the certification of the Mithril Verification Keys and PoolId in mithril-common instead 👍
We will use the code you created in the NewKeyReg of the PR #433 and adapt it in mithril-common. WDYT?
Yes, I was thinking about that. we are only missing computing the poolID from the cold key, but other than that, we have compatibility. I'm now trying to install the node cli in my machine to try and resolve this last missing point 😓
Issue
Implement the certification of the Mithril Verification Keys in the Signer and the Aggregator
Tasks
KES Secret Key
andOperational Certificate
to provide Mithril keys certificationKES Period
requester inside theChain Observer
Certified
andLegacy
to allow for smooth transition (no breaking changes)test_only
feature for them)devnet
test lab
and make it able to verify that Signers from both modes are able to contribute to signaturesDepends
Depends on #384
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: