-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Need for stats on profile pages (s4) #2793
Comments
re: # edits -- Admin pages do show # edits (https://openlibrary.org/admin/people/mekBot) meaning it wouldn't be hard to add as a first good issue. Marking as |
@mekarpeles the first link had a gateway timeout and the 2nd I don't have permission for. These are made public if so chosen. I guess it's not important (as it's shown on the next page), but those numbers on the next page (if they're shown on the homepage of the links) I think is what I was saying. So the https://openlibrary.org/people/hawaiisunfun/books/currently-reading shows 0, 59, and 4. I think I was suggesting it to be here too: https://openlibrary.org/people/hawaiisunfun. This would prevent me from wasting time clicking on some part that obviously has nothing in it (like if I view another person's profile that has it public on their's too). Unless others want to see this too, it's ok if that's not added in. These are thoughts for in case we need it in the future. I just want to make sure we're all on the same page as to what I'm mentioning here, even if it's not implemented. I would say the most important ones to me are the # of lists (like adding the number of lists the person created (like 'lists: 3', or '3 lists'), unless it's private, as what's nice that's currently there are how many works are in a list already) and # of edits (like how many books that added to the OL and how many total contributions). |
I'm not entirely sure if we need statistics on each individual member's profile, but I brought it up, because it may be a good idea (maybe others could say their thoughts about it too). If I was to see stats though, here are my ideas:
I personally don't think we need 3., but it's just a list of everything for the next step of prioritizing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: