Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: adapter send command "close" twice via MQTT to shelly 2.5 (Version1) #941

Open
3 tasks done
fred0815 opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
3 tasks done
Assignees

Comments

@fred0815
Copy link

I'm sure that

  • This issue is still present in the current beta version of this adapter
  • There is no other (open) issue with the same topic (use the search!)
  • This issue is not described in the adapter documentation / FAQ (read the docs!)

Shelly device

shelly 2.5 (Version1)

Shelly firmware version

20230913-112234/v1.14.0-gcb84623

Protocol

MQTT

The problem

send command "close" and "open" twice to shelly adapter via VIS (jqui -ctrl - icon - state)

iobroker.current.log (in debug mode!)

2024-01-29 09:08:57.009 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [mqtt controlFunction] Executing state.mqtt.mqtt_cmd_funct of state SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1.Shutter.Close for 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) with value: false -> close
2024-01-29 09:08:57.009 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [MQTT] Send state to 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) with QoS 1: shellies/shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68/roller/0/command = close (6)
2024-01-29 09:08:57.027 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [MQTT] Publish: 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) - topic: shellies/shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68/roller/0, qos: 0, payload: close
2024-01-29 09:08:57.029 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [MQTT] State change 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1): shellies/shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68/roller/0 -> state: SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1.Shutter.state, value: "close"
2024-01-29 09:08:57.030 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [MQTT] Publish: 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) - topic: shellies/shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68/roller/0/pos, qos: 0, payload: -1
2024-01-29 09:08:57.031 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [MQTT] Publish: 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) - topic: shellies/shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68/roller/0/stop_reason, qos: 0, payload: normal
2024-01-29 09:08:57.261 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [httpIoBrokerState] State change 192.168.179.21 (shellyuni / shellyuni-34945477DFFD / SHUNI-1#34945477DFFD#1): state: SHUNI-1#34945477DFFD#1.uptime, value: 4143514
2024-01-29 09:08:57.819 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [httpIoBrokerState] State change 192.168.179.22 (shellyplus1 / shellyplus1-7c87ce7257e0 / shellyplus1#7c87ce7257e0#1): state: shellyplus1#7c87ce7257e0#1.uptime, value: 8082594
2024-01-29 09:08:57.980 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [httpIoBrokerState] State change 192.168.179.15 (shellyrgbw2 / shellyrgbw2-807FE9 / SHRGBW2#807FE9#1): state: SHRGBW2#807FE9#1.uptime, value: 207124
2024-01-29 09:08:58.017 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [onStateChange] "shelly.0.SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1.Shutter.Close" state changed: {"val":false,"ack":false,"ts":1706515738012,"q":0,"c":"script.js.common.Automatik_Zimmer_Rollos","from":"system.adapter.javascript.0","user":"system.user.admin","lc":1706515181596} - forwarding to objectHelper
2024-01-29 09:08:58.018 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [mqtt controlFunction] Executing state.mqtt.mqtt_cmd_funct of state SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1.Shutter.Close for 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) with value: false -> close
2024-01-29 09:08:58.018 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [MQTT] Send state to 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) with QoS 1: shellies/shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68/roller/0/command = close (7)
2024-01-29 09:08:58.301 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [MQTT] Publish: 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) - topic: shellies/shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68/roller/0/pos, qos: 0, payload: -1
2024-01-29 09:08:58.304 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [MQTT] Publish: 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) - topic: shellies/shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68/roller/0/stop_reason, qos: 0, payload: normal
2024-01-29 09:08:58.309 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [MQTT] Publish: 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) - topic: shellies/shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68/roller/0/pos, qos: 0, payload: -1
2024-01-29 09:08:58.312 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [MQTT] Publish: 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) - topic: shellies/shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68/roller/0/stop_reason, qos: 0, payload: normal
2024-01-29 09:08:58.315 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [MQTT] Publish: 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) - topic: shellies/shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68/roller/0/pos, qos: 0, payload: -1
2024-01-29 09:08:58.317 - debug: shelly.0 (32093) [MQTT] Publish: 192.168.179.12 (shellyswitch25 / shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68 / SHSW-25#84CCA8B11B68#1) - topic: shellies/shellyswitch25-84CCA8B11B68/roller/0/stop_reason, qos: 0, payload: normal
shelly command twice.log

Version of nodejs

v18.17.1

Version of ioBroker js-controller

5.0.17

Version of adapter

6.7.0

Copy link

Thanks for reporting a new issue @fred0815!

  1. Please make sure your topic is not covered in the documentation
  2. Ensure that you use the latest beta version (not the current stable version): 6.7.0
  3. Please attach all necessary log files (in debug mode!), screenshots and other information to reproduce this issue
  4. Search for the issue topic in other/closed issues to avoid duplicates!

Otherwise this issue will be closed.

@fred0815
Copy link
Author

changed QoS to "2" and the adapter send the command only once.

@fred0815 fred0815 reopened this Jan 30, 2024
@fred0815
Copy link
Author

May be it it could be a correct technical behavior that the command will be send twice. From a perspective of the enduser, the quality of "service" is not really good, if the shelly stucks because he received the command "stop" or "up" or "down" twice.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants