Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Task] Support publicKeyJwk verification material format #308

Closed
8 tasks
cycraig opened this issue Jul 13, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed
8 tasks

[Task] Support publicKeyJwk verification material format #308

cycraig opened this issue Jul 13, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or improvement to an existing feature
Milestone

Comments

@cycraig
Copy link
Contributor

cycraig commented Jul 13, 2021

Description

Implement publicKeyJwk as a verification material format according to the DID-core specification.

We currently have a placeholder enum for publicKeyJwk that is not implemented.

Motivation

Comply with the W3C DID specification.

Resources

To-do list

Create a task-specific to-do list . Please link PRs that match the To-do list item behind the item after it has been submitted.

  • Implement publicKeyJwk, with tests
  • Add publicKeyJwk examples with various combinations of valid properties in the JWK

Change checklist

Add an x to the boxes that are relevant to your changes, and delete any items that are not.

  • The feature or fix is implemented in Rust and across all bindings whereas possible.
  • The feature or fix has sufficient testing coverage
  • All tests and examples build and run locally as expected
  • Every piece of code has been document according to the documentation guidelines.
  • If conceptual documentation (mdbook) and examples highlighting the feature exist, they are properly updated.
  • If the feature is not currently documented, a documentation task Issue has been opened to address this.
@cycraig cycraig added the Enhancement New feature or improvement to an existing feature label Jul 13, 2021
@cycraig cycraig self-assigned this Jul 13, 2021
@l1h3r
Copy link
Contributor

l1h3r commented Jul 13, 2021

This will need one or more signature suites before it can be fully utilized in a DID Document. Currently there is the JSON Web Signature 2020 suite from the Linked Data Proofs spec but it uses a JSON-LD canonicalization algorithm that we didn't intend to support (JSON-LD support is a much bigger task).

I added this issue for creating a new suite with a supported canonicalization algorithm. It can be picked up anytime by anyone and will probably need a bit of discussion regarding supported algorithms though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or improvement to an existing feature
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants