-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
Conversation
content/post/28-js-ipfs-0.25.md
Outdated
|
||
### 🏮 ipfs-repo is now 🐲 free | ||
|
||
The IPFS Repo Class went through [some careful refactoring process](https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs-repo/pull/140). Now it is easier to understand its internals and to support different backend storage adapters. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"some careful refactoring"
content/post/28-js-ipfs-0.25.md
Outdated
|
||
The IPFS Repo Class went through [some careful refactoring process](https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs-repo/pull/140). Now it is easier to understand its internals and to support different backend storage adapters. | ||
|
||
To create a js-ipfs node with your own custom repo you just have to: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"your own custom repo, you can now:" (if this is a new improvement/simplification?)
|
||
|
||
If you run into any hurdles, please open an issue on [ipfs/js-ipfs/issues](https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs). | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a good time to add our "contributor thank you" section? Can be simple to start, e.g.:
Thank you to the ## contributors to this release, and to all past and future contributors of jp-ipfs 🎉:
@username1 @username2 etc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can create a list but at the risk of being incomplete. (Which would be a bummer if someone is left out).
I really want to do that though, to make that work extremely well it would be important to have:
- lint the commit messages to follow the same standard
- have a tool that tracks all the contributions in the dep tree
That makes sense, I'm ok with punting until later. Maybe we can hack on it
during lab week :)
…On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:11 PM, David Dias ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In content/post/28-js-ipfs-0.25.md
<#128 (comment)>:
> +
+The JavaScript implementation of libp2p received a lot of love recently, including the addition of Tutorials. You can consult all the details on the Log entry of libp2p's Captain.log - libp2p/js-libp2p#6 (comment)
+
+### 🏎 SPDY is out of the mix and there goes browserify-zlib special shimming.
+
+SPDY has been removed from the default browser bundle in favor of supporting `libp2p-multiplex` only. SPDY was the Stream Muxer of js-ipfs since almost the beginning, but since go-ipfs never got a complete implementation of SPDY, we ended up switching to `libp2p-multiplex` to guarantee interop between implementations. What this means is that you will continue to see the interop, but now your browser bundle will be significantly lighter.
+
+### 📞 wrtc, the WebRTC module for Node.js is now optional
+
+`wrtc`, a module that enables js-ipfs Node.js nodes to speak WebRTC, has been excluded from the default list of modules so that Linux users can have a better time when using js-ipfs natively. You can still bring it back and now not only use `wrtc` but you can also use `electron-webrtc`, the other WebRTC module for Node.js See how to achieve that in the project's README - https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs#advanced-options-when-creating-an-ipfs-node.
+
+Note, this doesn't change the behavior in the browser. Browser nodes will still continue to use WebRTC by default.
+
+
+If you run into any hurdles, please open an issue on [ipfs/js-ipfs/issues](https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs).
+
We can create a list but at the risk of being incomplete. (Which would be
a bummer if someone is left out).
I really want to do that though, to make that work extremely well it would
be important to have:
- lint the commit messages to follow the same standard
- have a tool that tracks all the contributions in the dep tree
—
You are receiving this because your review was requested.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#128 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPtpCWMpWY2USRh-mUR-x0qJc7Npb0mks5sNPAZgaJpZM4OVQjf>
.
|
No description provided.