Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 28, 2023. It is now read-only.

Method proto.DelegatedRouting_Client.GetIPNS is never used. #30

Closed
Tracked by #9150
ajnavarro opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed
Tracked by #9150

Method proto.DelegatedRouting_Client.GetIPNS is never used. #30

ajnavarro opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization

Comments

@ajnavarro
Copy link
Member

ajnavarro commented Jul 6, 2022

Client implementation uses GetIPNSAsync for GetIPNS.

@ajnavarro ajnavarro added kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization labels Jul 6, 2022
@ajnavarro ajnavarro changed the title Methods proto.DelegatedRouting_Client.GetIPNS and proto.DelegatedRouting_Client.PutIPNS are never used. Method proto.DelegatedRouting_Client.GetIPNS is never used. Jul 6, 2022
@BigLep
Copy link

BigLep commented Jul 25, 2022

@ajnavarro : I'm confused. What is the done criteria for this issue? I assume we're removing something? Lets please specify that.

@ajnavarro
Copy link
Member Author

ajnavarro commented Jul 26, 2022

Actually, I'm not sure. I would say to use DelegatedRouting_Client.GetIPNS instead of DelegatedRouting_Client.GetIPNS_Async will be the right approach, but maybe I'm missing something and it is done that way for a reason.

Here is the confusing line https://github.com/ipfs/go-delegated-routing/blob/main/client/getipns.go#L13

@ajnavarro
Copy link
Member Author

Fix not needed.

@ajnavarro ajnavarro closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 2, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants