-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 412
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Include community-managed bootstrap nodes to the Configure a Node page. #334
Comments
This sounds like a nice to have |
If the needed input is available @momack2 I am happy to start with this issue. |
This is tricky. Updating a list of public and live bootstrap nodes could be costly in terms of time. What would be better is if we had an automated service that observes the DHT and returns a set of stable peers that have been online for ~1 day or more. The docs could then link to that service. |
I don't think that was quite the intended approach, @johnnymatthews. This issue came from sourcing/identifying additional mechanisms to heal from hypothetical DOS attacks against the pre-configured IPFS bootstrap node list that ships in go-ipfs. With a community list here in the docs, nodes could re-configure to new bootstrap nodes if those default nodes are ever DOSed in an attack (unable to bootstrap new nodes into the network). The todo items to make this possible are:
|
Maybe we can just start with this list here (content provider list)? but probably better to have dedicated nodes with higher connection limits to act as potential bootstrap nodes... |
Oh I see! So this list of nodes will act as a backup in case the default bootstrap nodes go down for whatever reason. Makes sense. We could pretty easily make a workflow for users to create a PR to add new nodes. But:
Tasks
|
I think it can be fairly permissive - but some good standing in the ecosystem required (a malicious node could ex be annoying by bootstrapping new nodes into an isolated network and refuse to resolve content / peer them with other nodes). |
...in progress. |
@johnnymatthews How do I know when I have a complete or at least a largely representative list of IPFS Operators to request "bootstrap" node addresses from? So far we have:
Can you tell me who else (or how I can find out), such as:
|
Hello @andrewxhill, @obo20, @MichaelMure, @bmann, |
Hey @Annamarie2019 thanks for the ping. We could run some community accessible nodes but right now we've turned off routing of non Fission content. |
I've reached out to the IPFS team to see if we can get an authoritative list of community-ran bootstrap nodes. |
We want to add optional community bootstrap nodes that ipfs users can add to their node configs to provide more diversity/resilience in the bootstrapping flow. Since a number of groups already have these nodes, we'd like to add a small section to the bottom of this page to list the additional bootstrap nodes, and what organization they're being run by. I'll add a list here to be merged in as I collect the right IDs from various operators. =]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: