Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Get the API multiaddr through the api file #108

Closed
daviddias opened this issue Sep 16, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Get the API multiaddr through the api file #108

daviddias opened this issue Sep 16, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature

Comments

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

This #107 (comment) is currently really hacky
@daviddias daviddias added kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue labels Sep 16, 2016
@daviddias daviddias mentioned this issue Sep 16, 2016
Merged
@haadcode
Copy link
Member

Related, I added the gateway address so that when daemon is bound to .../tcp/0, we get the gateway address back: https://github.com/haadcode/js-ipfsd-ctl/commit/257712108919a05c625b02399b82d873675bc559. @diasdavid want me to PR this?

@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

please do :)

@daviddias daviddias mentioned this issue Nov 10, 2016
Closed
@daviddias daviddias added status/ready Ready to be worked and removed js-ipfs-ready labels Dec 5, 2016
@haadcode haadcode removed their assignment Jan 17, 2017
@daviddias daviddias added status/deferred Conscious decision to pause or backlog and removed status/ready Ready to be worked labels Jan 29, 2017
@daviddias daviddias added status/ready Ready to be worked and removed status/deferred Conscious decision to pause or backlog labels Oct 17, 2017
@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

@haadcode I'll take your haadcode removed their assignment on 17 Jan as no follow up for this issue. Closing then :)

@ghost ghost removed the status/ready Ready to be worked label Oct 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@daviddias @haadcode