Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ERROR basichost: DiscoverNAT error: no NAT found natmgr.go:96 #6142

Closed
Mikaela opened this issue Mar 27, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

ERROR basichost: DiscoverNAT error: no NAT found natmgr.go:96 #6142

Mikaela opened this issue Mar 27, 2019 · 6 comments
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws)

Comments

@Mikaela
Copy link
Contributor

Mikaela commented Mar 27, 2019

Version information:

go-ipfs version: 0.4.20-dev 1682880
Repo version: 7
System version: amd64/linux
Golang version: go1.11.5

Type: bug

Description:

When I start ipfs via systemd, I see Mar 27 18:00:30 sedric ipfs[638]: 18:00:30.087 ERROR basichost: DiscoverNAT error: no NAT found natmgr.go:96 in journalctl -u ipfs. I thought that I would report it just in case, even if it doesn't seem to affect IPFS functioning any way.

I don't understand the error and I am definitely behind Carrier Grade NAT. I think this error didn't happen on 0.4.19 where I upgraded from due to #6070.

@Kubuxu
Copy link
Member

Kubuxu commented Mar 27, 2019

It shouldn't be on the error level.

@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

Yeah, this should definitely be at the info level.

@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

(note: this actually means we didn't find a NAT we could portmap with...)

@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

libp2p/go-libp2p#568

@Stebalien Stebalien mentioned this issue Apr 3, 2019
9 tasks
@Stebalien Stebalien added the kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) label Apr 25, 2019
@tangray
Copy link

tangray commented Jul 10, 2019

i want to know how to solve this problem ,can you give me a solution?

@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

This was a noisy error that has been fixed in v0.4.20. Please upgrade.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants