concordance factor: -scfl flag does not work but -scf does #366
Unanswered
crcardenas
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
Sorry for the delay. This is because ethiopia_36min_parti.nex.best_model.nex is a partition file and should be used as such input, see for example http://www.iqtree.org/doc/Advanced-Tutorial#partitioned-analysis-for-multi-gene-alignments. -m is for specifying single models, not partition models. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
I have had this issues running iqtree2 for concordance factors on my datasets. I would like to run the
-scfl
flag, but only the-scf
flag works with my data.I am running
Version IQ-TREE multicore version 2.3.6 for Linux x86 64-bit built Aug 4 2024
My command is a simple for loop:
When running this code, I get the following error:
I have tried loosing the for loop and changing the
-m
flag to-S
(as seen in another issue: #155 ; but it is listed as -m on the documentation). However chaning the-m
flag to-S
, I get a different error:I even tried the different model files generated by IQTree2 with variations of the
-m
and-S
flags. So I do not believe that-m
to-S
is the solution.However, I know these files I am using should work because I have run them using
--scf
which warns me I should use--scfl
flag when completing the analyses. In both cases using-m
and-S
flags work fine for the--scf
flag. Lastly, I further tried changing my input tree flag from-te
to-t
which produces the same errors I've described previously when testing-t
with the-m
and-S
flags.Here are the associated input files for my smallest dataset example_scf_error.zip. Within it are example_scf successful runs and the example
--scfl
error log. Please ignore the quality of the input data, it is fairly "raw" and unprocessed for some issues I have resolved in a parallel dataset.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions