You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 18, 2021. It is now read-only.
We "merge" our PRs via rebase / cherry-pick and amending commit messages with "closes #". However, this gives the PR the "closed" status as if you closed the pull request without accepting the changes. This causes our JIRA integration to think the pull request has been declined.
It would be nice if we could have a "rebased" status or perhaps another workaround so our JIRA integration can detect accepted pull requests that were not merged. Having the option to mark the PR as such through a commit message or through the website would be nice as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
👍 for this; a lot of projects like nodejs development still favors the original linux kernel development style: some core maintainer add Reviewed-by:Acked-by: and series of those and commit and push for you, since the commit msg has somewhat changed, it's not the original commit github can't detect as merged; but the content of changes are the same
in this comment, @jasnell has to manually say Landed in 983a809 and close the PR which is inconvenient; as I think @github should detect this case and mark nodejs/node#6350 as merged automatically.
We "merge" our PRs via rebase / cherry-pick and amending commit messages with "closes #". However, this gives the PR the "closed" status as if you closed the pull request without accepting the changes. This causes our JIRA integration to think the pull request has been declined.
It would be nice if we could have a "rebased" status or perhaps another workaround so our JIRA integration can detect accepted pull requests that were not merged. Having the option to mark the PR as such through a commit message or through the website would be nice as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: