Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi,
I believe the 0.95 was picked as "some very high temporal coherence" in case you wanted to mask out low coherence pixels later. There's no significance to 0.95 exactly, AFAIK. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
The final coherence (tcorr_ps_ds.bin) of the PS targets is constantly been 0.95. Then in Mintpy I can exclude PS targets by mask but trying to figure out why PS target integration is needed in the current implementation.
Thx.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions