You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
thanks for your code! but ,here is a question about the code.I notice that in your code, the form of the edge set doesn't support the other value of the edge.In contrast, we can only use the value of 1 for any edge just to show that whether there is a edge between the nodes,right?
I've read the paper.I think that as a pruned BFS based on the landmark, this technique is able to fit on the other value of the edge.
Now I'm confused about that.I want to know that if there is a code about this paper to focus on the other value of the edges.
Thanks for any help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
thanks for your code! but ,here is a question about the code.I notice that in your code, the form of the edge set doesn't support the other value of the edge.In contrast, we can only use the value of 1 for any edge just to show that whether there is a edge between the nodes,right?
I've read the paper.I think that as a pruned BFS based on the landmark, this technique is able to fit on the other value of the edge.
Now I'm confused about that.I want to know that if there is a code about this paper to focus on the other value of the edges.
Thanks for any help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: