Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow defining null handling for ORDER BY expressions in JPQL and the Criteria API #130

Closed
lukasj opened this issue Jul 6, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Allow defining null handling for ORDER BY expressions in JPQL and the Criteria API #130

lukasj opened this issue Jul 6, 2016 · 6 comments
Labels
Priority: Major Type: Improvement

Comments

@lukasj
Copy link
Contributor

lukasj commented Jul 6, 2016

Currently, neither JPQL nor the Criteria API allow defining how to handle null values in ORDER BY expressions. All major persistence providers support those clauses though, which makes it sort of usable through JPQL (as the provider might allow the custom extensions) but not through the Criteria API.

Affected Versions

[2.1.1]
@lukasj
Copy link
Contributor Author

lukasj commented Jul 6, 2016

@glassfishrobot Commented
Reported by oliver.gierke

@lukasj
Copy link
Contributor Author

lukasj commented Dec 1, 2016

@glassfishrobot Commented
neilstockton said:
Dup of https://java.net/jira/browse/JPA_SPEC-76 no?

@lukasj
Copy link
Contributor Author

lukasj commented May 5, 2017

@glassfishrobot Commented
This issue was imported from java.net JIRA JPA_SPEC-130

@lukasj
Copy link
Contributor Author

lukasj commented Jun 20, 2017

@olivergierke Commented
Looks like this is duplicating #76. Assuming this won't be included in the JPA version included in JavaEE 8, right?

@lukasj
Copy link
Contributor Author

lukasj commented Aug 31, 2018

@gavinking
Copy link
Contributor

dupe of #76, fixed by #440.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Priority: Major Type: Improvement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gavinking @lukasj