Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Dev] GitHub Pages- Build site workflow is failing #181

Closed
DanielYang59 opened this issue Jul 19, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by janosh/workflows#4
Closed

[Dev] GitHub Pages- Build site workflow is failing #181

DanielYang59 opened this issue Jul 19, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by janosh/workflows#4

Comments

@DanielYang59
Copy link
Collaborator

DanielYang59 commented Jul 19, 2024

GitHub Pages- Build site workflow is failing. Looks like the same as npm/cli#7666.

Just guess, not sure, perhaps we should limit the version to 22.4 npm/cli#7666 (comment):
https://github.com/janosh/workflows/blob/a03fa54b611812dc710460abe6ad69ddec4984bc/.github/workflows/nodejs-gh-pages.yml#L6-L9

@DanielYang59
Copy link
Collaborator Author

DanielYang59 commented Jul 19, 2024

For some reason NodeJS is still version 22.5.0 (perhaps the workflow need some time to update?)? Meanwhile don't know where the following error come from (why cssutils is needed to build docs)?

Failed to generate docs for module io: ModuleNotFoundError("No module named 'cssutils'")

@DanielYang59 DanielYang59 reopened this Jul 19, 2024
@janosh
Copy link
Owner

janosh commented Jul 19, 2024

For some reason NodeJS is still version 22.5.0 (perhaps the workflow need some time to update?)?

not to worry, pretty sure that's just because i reran a workflow that triggered before this PR was merged and so it seems to have used the same commit SHA it ran with the 1st time, i.e. with the code before this PR

@janosh janosh closed this as completed Jul 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants