Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: Meta-analysis: Add Orwin’s Fail-Safe N #141

Open
giligg opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

[Feature Request]: Meta-analysis: Add Orwin’s Fail-Safe N #141

giligg opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@giligg
Copy link

giligg commented Mar 5, 2018

  • Enhancement: adding Orwin’s Fail-Safe N for the file-drawer analysis.
  • Purpose: Currently included is the Rosenthal Fail-Safe N analysis which has several shortcoming and is less reported in meta-analses papers. Orwin’s method allows for more flexibility in the analysis by not assuming the missing effect size are equal to 0, so it can be specified missing effect sizes in any value. Also we can determine what effect size other than 0 we want the reduce the overall effect to.
@JorisGoosen JorisGoosen transferred this issue from jasp-stats/jasp-desktop Nov 13, 2018
@tomtomme
Copy link
Member

tomtomme commented Dec 23, 2023

Still valid for 0.19 beta

@tomtomme tomtomme added the Stale Issues and pull requests that have not had recent interaction label Mar 7, 2024
@FBartos
Copy link

FBartos commented Apr 11, 2024

I will do a larger revamp of the meta-analysis module this year and keep this in mind

@tomtomme tomtomme removed the Stale Issues and pull requests that have not had recent interaction label Apr 11, 2024
@tomtomme tomtomme changed the title Meta-analysis: Add Orwin’s Fail-Safe N [Feature Request]: Meta-analysis: Add Orwin’s Fail-Safe N Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants